Difference Between 3m 2091 and 2097 Filters

The Difference Between 3m 2091 and 2097 Filters

The 3M 2091 and 2097 filters are designed to protect against particulates in the air. Both filters are certified by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) to have a particulate efficiency of 95%, making them effective in filtering out particles as small as 0.3 microns. Despite the similarities in protection, there are some key differences between these two filters.

Design

The 3M 2091 filter has a simple design and consists of one layer of filter media. The filter is constructed using a combination of non-woven polypropylene, melt-blown polypropylene, and cellulose polyester. This design ensures that the filter provides the necessary protection against airborne particles.

On the other hand, the 3M 2097 filter is more complex in design, with two layers of filter media. The first layer is made from a combination of polypropylene, polyester, and polyethylene, while the second layer is made of polypropylene. This design produces a filter that is able to trap and retain smaller particles, which increases its efficiency in filtering out particulates.

Compatibility

The 3M 2091 filter is compatible with all 3M 6000 and 7000 series respirators. This filter can also be used with 3M 6000 and 7000 series gas and vapor cartridges.

The 3M 2097 filter, on the other hand, is only compatible with 3M 6000 and 7000 series respirators with bayonet connections. These filters cannot be used with 3M 6000 and 7000 series gas and vapor cartridges.

Durability

The 3M 2091 filter is made from a combination of non-woven polypropylene, melt-blown polypropylene, and cellulose polyester. This design ensures that the filter is durable and can resist tears and punctures.

You may also like  Difference Between Cedar and Pine

The 3M 2097 filter is made from a combination of polypropylene, polyester, and polyethylene. This design makes the filter more durable than the 3M 2091 filter, but it is not as resistant to tears and punctures.

Conclusion

The 3M 2091 and 2097 filters are both designed to protect against particulates in the air. Despite the similarities in protection, there are some key differences between these two filters. The 3M 2091 filter has a simple design and is compatible with all 3M 6000 and 7000 series respirators, while the 3M 2097 filter is more complex in design and is only compatible with 3M 6000 and 7000 series respirators with bayonet connections. The 3M 2091 filter is also more durable than the 3M 2097 filter.

Difference in Filter Media

The most significant difference between the 3M 2091 and 2097 filters is their respective filter media. The 3M 2091 filter consists of two filter layers. The first layer of the filter is made of Advanced Electret Media (AEM), which is composed of synthetic fibers. This filter material is designed to trap particles larger than 0.3 microns in size, such as dust particles, pollen, and mold spores. The second layer of the filter is made of meltblown microfibers, which is designed to trap particles smaller than 0.3 microns in size, such as smoke, bacteria, and viruses.

The 3M 2097 filter also consists of two filter layers. However, the first layer of the filter is made of a different material than the 3M 2091 filter. The first layer of the 3M 2097 filter is made of P100 filter media, which is composed of 100% synthetic fibers that can trap particles as small as 0.3 microns in size. The second layer of the 3M 2097 filter is made of activated carbon filter media, which is designed to absorb odors and other gaseous contaminants.

You may also like  Difference Between Dyson V6 and V7

Difference in Filtration Efficiency

The filtration efficiency of the 3M 2091 and 2097 filters also differs. The 3M 2091 filter is designed to capture 99.97% of particles larger than 0.3 microns in size. The filter is also designed to capture 99.9% of particles smaller than 0.3 microns in size.

The 3M 2097 filter is designed to capture 99.97% of particles larger than 0.3 microns in size. The filter is also designed to capture 99.99% of particles smaller than 0.3 microns in size. This makes the 3M 2097 filter more effective at capturing smaller particles than the 3M 2091 filter.

Difference in Lifespan

The lifespan of the 3M 2091 and 2097 filters also differs. The 3M 2091 filter is designed to last for up to 40 hours of use, depending on the environment. The filter should be replaced once it has reached its maximum lifespan.

The 3M 2097 filter is designed to last for up to 60 hours of use, depending on the environment. The filter should also be replaced once it has reached its maximum lifespan. This makes the 3M 2097 filter more durable and longer-lasting than the 3M 2091 filter.

Leave a Comment